When You're Ready to Stop Being a Control Freak [link]
I appreciated this post. I'm a strong advocate of having conversations with your cards.
When You're Ready to Stop Being a Control Freak [link]
I appreciated this post. I'm a strong advocate of having conversations with your cards.
I did my first reading for someone else today since [checks notes...] November of last year! It flowed. Nice to know we (Spirit Team and me) haven’t lost our touch. 😁
It felt great to have a reason to read again, but I’m going to continue to keep a low profile. I prefer to scroll through sites* that offer free readings and be drawn to particular requests.
Today’s experience did remind me, though, of something I’d like to share -
It reconfirmed the value of a change I’ve made to my reading process over the past year or so. I now select a card as a significator for the focus of the reading, be that a person or an area of enquiry. The card serves as a magickal proxy, much like a poppet, and helps to draw in the energy of situation.
For years I balked at the idea of taking a card “out of play” to serve as a significator. Plus I didn’t really see the point. Now I appreciate the ‘sympathetic magick’ aspect and I’m finding it does make a difference. Besides, for cards meant to represent a person, I usually take one from another deck, most often my playing cards, so there’s no loss from the reading deck anyway.
If you don’t do this already, try it and see if it does anything for you.
*Not Facebook anymore. I haven’t deleted my account (yet); I’ve simply stopped participating in social media generally. (That’s another thing I can recommend.)
John Beckett's post Magical Ethics: How You Do Anything Is How You Do Everything is possibly the most clear and rational examination of the topic I've yet come across. Here are some of my favourite 'moments' -
"... ethics don’t exist to help people avoid punishment. Ethics exist to help people do the right thing in the first place."
"I can’t give you a bunch of rules to follow. If you need rules you're in the wrong religion."
"Ultimately there are no special ethics around magic. There are just ordinary ethics applied in a magical context."
Chris Egon Searle is not just the “hardest” man in tarot, he's one of the most sensible.
“People... want very spiritual answers that only apply to them...
They want [advice that’s really complicated] because they know they can’t follow it...
They can... use the complexity as an excuse of why it didn’t work.”
I think this goes some way towards explaining why many people who have something that’s concerning them are unwilling to ask a direct question about it and opt instead for a random spiritual message. If they got a clear and actionable answer to their question, they’d either have to do the thing or deliberately ignore the advice.
Not a yoga instructor, not a medium, not a reiki practitioner.
A card reader.
Therefore, to honour my Path, I must read cards.
I’m compelled by Spirit to read for others. But I’m not going to read for every person who knocks at my metaphorical door.
Some people are led to me by Spirit. Some just find me. I’m shown which is which and I’ll read for the former. Some readers may define it differently, but this is what I mean when I say I’m “drawn" to read for someone.
I think it’s fair to say that I don’t see this as a personal “service to mankind”. I am not a Light Worker. It’s not my show.
I read because it’s my Spiritual Calling and I go where Spirit sends me.
Psychic clairvoyant Pam Richards wrote an excellent piece which addresses some of the common mistakes those new to Tarot often make. I thought it was worth sharing.
12 Mistakes New Tarot Students Make
On the variations in meanings inherent in all card systems, and how and why we should find our own way.
Seasons Tune: Ad Astra (blog post)
You can't make a positive reading out of negative cardsWell, you can – I almost did – but you shouldn't.
![]() |
| Bottom card - I was misled and potentially misleading my sitter |
I resent the use of the word "graduate". I've been reading tarot quite successfully without reversals for over 40 years. I have an honorary degree. 😉 My style is cartomantic. Unless I'm using a spread with fixed positions (something I rarely do), I read by placement, proximity, facings, symbolism, etc. All the nuances of any given card, upright or reversed, are available to people who "read cards". If you want to use reversals, be my guest. But do not suggest that I'm lagging behind in any way.I've got nothing against people using reversals if that's how they roll. Do what works for you. But please don't make out that your tarot is somehow better or more advanced as a result. Just read your damn cards and mind your own business.